Game Ranked You Will Eat The Bugs - A Mafia game brought to you by the World Economic Forum

[Lindltaylor]

Frozen in scum chat possibly?

No just sleeping and woke up now.

 

[Lindltaylor]

Frozen in scum chat possibly?

What are your takes so far Reloaded? I haven't seen much from you so far.

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

What are your takes so far Reloaded? I haven't seen much from you so far.

1. Nibel
2. Magic
3. Lord Melkor
4. Gram
5. Tweet
6. Tempest
7. Lethal
8. Gad
9. Aurelian
10. LindLTaylor
11. Poyser
13. Fuji
14. Yoho
15. Ratchet
16. Bachi
17. RDK (not 100% though)
18. Rugrat

Kinda where I'm at.

Kekko put his slot in the pits lmao. Waiting to see more from that slot.

 

[Lindltaylor]

1. Nibel
2. Magic
3. Lord Melkor
4. Gram
5. Tweet
6. Tempest
7. Lethal
8. Gad
9. Aurelian
10. LindLTaylor
11. Poyser
13. Fuji
14. Yoho
15. Ratchet
16. Bachi
17. RDK (not 100% though)
18. Rugrat

Kinda where I'm at.

Kekko put his slot in the pits lmao. Waiting to see more from that slot.

I don't think Ekko put his slot in the pits lol. If he really hadn't read his role, then all his posts would have been un-informed anyway. No way to verify it, but that's a better assumption to make than the contradictory one to it since it helps up approach RDK with a clean slate. After all, Ekko barely had posts relating to scum hunting anyway. I think I remember just seeing 1 or 2 from him.

 

[Lindltaylor]

1. Nibel
2. Magic
3. Lord Melkor
4. Gram
5. Tweet
6. Tempest
7. Lethal
8. Gad
9. Aurelian
10. LindLTaylor
11. Poyser
13. Fuji
14. Yoho
15. Ratchet
16. Bachi
17. RDK (not 100% though)
18. Rugrat

Kinda where I'm at.

Kekko put his slot in the pits lmao. Waiting to see more from that slot.

Could you explain the null (I'm assuming null since they're not coloured) on Magic, Tweet and me?

 

[Hans Tweetenberg]

Since RDK isn't exactly doing much, we'll likely have to judge him on the flips of the people he voted or didn't vote down the line

Can we try and get something done please, day already got extended and we still haven't accomplished anything

Here I'll help with Gad or something

vote lynch Gad

 

[Lethal]

Why is Gad seemingly our new day 1 pressure cooker?

 

[Lethal]

Oh ekko repped out? Lmao

 

[Lethal]

Magic trying to lead town again after failing so spectacularly last game is cute as fuck.

Vote: Magic

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

Could you explain the null (I'm assuming null since they're not coloured) on Magic, Tweet and me?

My initial reads on you and Magic were town, I merely retracted those reads due to being a bit brash with town leans. After doing doing a quick ISO I think I can see tweet being somewhat townie.

 

[Mr. Reloaded]

Magic and Lind can be town I guess

 

[Magic]

Magic trying to lead town again after failing so spectacularly last game is cute as fuck.

Vote: Magic

Any other thoughts?

Me not leading in games has been an issue.

 

[Grammaton]

Magic trying to lead town again after failing so spectacularly last game is cute as fuck.

Vote: Magic

Welcome to my scum reads, this is a 100% performative vote designed only to get ‘lethal wouldn’t do that’ reads

 

[Lord Melkor]

Hmm, I am aware that you have suspicions on Nibel. However now stating that you think Melkor is town is somewhat incongruous to “I don’t know what to think on Melkor”.

I did forget Poyser (which is the only one), however Ratchet would fall into the “on one hand but on the other hand” category. You didn’t like his bullish/hastey read on you, however agreed with his lay of the land.

My reads are that Fang seems much more open with his posting, when I would have expected larger caution so I believe he is town. I thought Poyser made some EXTREMELY EXCELLENT points on Lind which is why I’m voting him - and why I think Poyser is town.. Tweet is also on this wagon too, which lends credence. Whilst I don’t specifically have a town read on Tweet, he has picked up numerous town leans at this juncture. I don’t like Magic voting GAD. He’s expressed doubts on both you and GAD, in a case of having doubts on two players or suspected parity - I think the “better” player should always be looked at first since they are the bigger thorn, which isn’t something I’m a fan of from Magic. Whilst he may believe that GAD is scummy, he is indubitably low hanging fruit as evidenced by his D1 lynch last game - so I feel it is disingenuous to portray this otherwise.

Do you have a read on Gad?

 

[Poyser]

What do you mean by this?

Just taking the piss cos mox used to be a big star who’s now getting jobbed out to random japs. Gram jobbing to fang

 

[Poyser]

melkor let's take a step back and let me ask you if 6 players are playing the first 30 hours is it reasonable to find suspicion in half of them when the majority haven't posted much and basically find weaknesses in those 6 people's posts based on what little occurred.

that isn't to say that everyone that was posting to start the game is town, im stating that it isn't hard to find flaws in approach to people that are working with very little.

the lind read in particular seems bad to me because there's a justifiable answer in there. again i wont give the answer, lind can do that themselves.

the yoho town read he's already retracted. Also lind showed a game showing behaviour from yoho that was similar to this game, which poyser agreed with, and yet that means nothing to poyser's position on lind. he basically called out lind for a bad take that then lind proved wasn't bad and yet it prompted nothing in poyser's mind. Nor did the aurelian follow or lind's behaviour in reassessing after he commented. he basically said he didn't expect it yet it changed nothing to him as far as i can tell.

I voted Lind before he tried to muddy Yoho, then when he did that I was like yeah this is awful, pretty sure this guy is just scum but then he backed up why he did it so i retracted that point against him. I still think my original points hold water hence my vote is still there. I’m not sure why you think Aurelian following me should have changed anything? I already said I think Aurelian is town based on his entrance.

You’re right that I don’t really know what to make of lind basically conceding I might be right after I voted, but again it’s not something I really think changes anything as it’s just appeasement at the end of the day and if you want to be super cynical, him offering up a reassessment on bachi could very much be an avenue he’s decided to take to provide an alternative wagon to himself

I think he’s easily the best direction so far. I wouldn’t mind following you on gad as you do tend to have a good track record there, but mine is the much larger wagon currently so I’d rather get a claim and see what shakes out

 

[Poyser]

I think I'm gonna prioritize policying the guy who's making a habit out of personally insulting everyone sussing him

vote lynch Aurelian

Egh actually fuck that

vote lynch Bachi

When I first read this I was like “this is dodgy as he clearly voted fang and then immediately retracted it after reading Rugrat’s post” lmao but I suppose that could be a town move as well if you thought Rugrat’s post was good

But you didn’t mention Rugrat or his post in your change of vote so can you tell me why you changed so quick?

 

[Poyser]

I will since I'm still failing to understand why Gad voted me
[Vote Gad]

Breh why not just admit you are sheeping magic? Why you gotta pretend like this is where you want your vote anyway?

This is why people tend to read you as scummy. Your posts are so dishonest

 

[Poyser]

Okay, this is inaccurate:
My initial scum read on Tweet came from his posts towards Bachi as I outlined before and once again in my post to Rugrat:

I said that it would be better for Tweet to prod other avenues for me to get a better read of his slot if he isn't going to substantiate his read on Bachi:


Given the low activity thread state, any avenues of approach helps generate activity and and would be better for me to get more reads not only on Tweet, but other respondents as well.


The original point is a standard I am proposing to not only better read him, but might be better for the thread. Tunneling or commenting on only a single slot, however, won't help me here and thus my proposal to tweet stands. And AFTER THAT, the way a player approaches a slot is taken into account as well. This latter point is what I used against Melkor here:


I'm suggesting that Tweet could approach different slots to help me understand his approach because his approach to Bachi was mainly on tone and tone is subjective - interpreted differently by different players. Therefore, more substantiation on Bachi's slot could have been made to convince me, or prodding elsewhere. Prodding elsewhere would help me see his approach to different players and judge those approaches - a metric I used on Melkor as quoted above.


No. Read above ^. The approaches to both the slots are nuanced in steps and different. According to you, then, I wouldn't be giving Tweet more consideration and re-think my read on his slot if what you said was my main pet peeve with him, but I'm doing the exact opposite here:

If I read Tweet as scum for not prodding more people, then I wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt for being stubborn on a single read. What happened is exactly the opposite of what you said.

Eh I’m ngl my eyes glazed over reading this shit lol

If you think tweet might be town then who are your scum reads currently? Are you voting anyone?

Also did you re-read bachi like you said you would?

 

[Poyser]

And with all that and catching up, I'd like to read Hans as town here. There's no merit for him as scum to town read me when he could have simply jumped the wagon, same for Melkor. Town read on Magic as well.

Rugrat goes into my scum reads. He was one of the players present during the entire inactivity phase of this day and also responded to my Tweet post at the time that he doesn't see a weak case at a formative point in the phase on someone to be scum. If he's extending curtesy to one slot for that measure, it should coincide to extending the same to other slots too. And if he had problems, he didn't mention any of it then with my case until now really. Looks very opportunistic.

Oh ok should have read this before I posted kek

What exactly is it that you’re holding against Rugrat here as it seems to be solely a case of him defending tweet against you and then voting you? Is your assertion that he shouldn’t be holding your weak case against you?

Also no vote?