One Last Username
Distinguished
You shouldn’t. Rugrats figured out my role by name while you have not.Already said OLU
You shouldn’t. Rugrats figured out my role by name while you have not.Already said OLU
Because no lynching has been our biggest problem and scum may win if we no lynchWhy are people echoing a fear of no lynch in lylo =/
Woof
My lack of curiosity means what, exactly, in this context? I mentioned that OLU did have a failed kill against him, and followed up with TAT in a seperate post - you're removing this context to make an argument that is already adressed. Bad logic.I take issue with your lack of curiosity, yes.
I don't have a solid solve at the moment
My current outlook is:
Gram
Ratchet
One of OLU/Goth
Dalton
Rugrat/Imposter
In descending order of confidence.
Anyway, with TAT in particular, I find it just a bit difficult to mesh the timing of his claim yesterday, his purposeful omission of the JK claim, his sudden hand showing that he blocked Xenos with a fake. Just seems like a hard thing for him to pull off as scum. I'd expect him to give his full fake claim, block Xenos and come up with retroactive reasoning for doing so that's still along the lines of what he's put forth. I guess my burning question about his slot would be why he picked Xenos to jail then and there, and so if he's scum he pretty much necessarily has to be buddies with OLU. Woof.
Because no lynching has been our biggest problem and scum may win if we no lynch
Town getting their act together for a lynch is a HUGE concern when we’ve not lynched a single mafia.I feel like that's significantly less of a concern with Maj 7, and we're like a quarter into the day?
You really should take other posts into account. TAT talked about the jail - I pointed out that it's only his testimony, in other words not 100% reliable. The point around the kill isn't a big one anyway, it's just an additional thing to consider - which of course I was promoting by bringing it up. Again, bad logic. You're ignoring wider context to make a point that serves as some weird gotcha.Here's the point I'm getting at: Earlier in the day I outlined a specific behavioral pattern for why I think TAT is a bit more likely to be town given what he claimed.
I think if the angle of TAT being OLU's buddy is being pushed, not only should the diligence be taken to check if they're even likely as partners, but finding an explanation for his play angle here should not be hard. Like, you could even possibly claim that he claimed JK specifically to spare his buddy suspicion. But instead, Ratchet, you're forgoing thinking about it alltogether. Woof.
Town getting their act together for a lynch is a HUGE concern when we’ve not lynched a single mafia.
if they have an exe at this stage, the game is already over. It just is, even with 4 mafia they alone can meet the requirements.Yeah or you're just trying to get a quick pile on for Exe to activate and are tagging the most likely player to dogwalk. Not liking this. Woof.
Town getting their act together for a lynch is a HUGE concern when we’ve not lynched a single mafia.
Yeah or you're just trying to get a quick pile on for Exe to activate and are tagging the most likely player to dogwalk. Not liking this. Woof.
I'm very conflicted tbh.Alco where is your head at?
What nugget?I'm very conflicted tbh.
Part of me can't shake that nugget about the OLU wagon, which was almost entirely town then stopped in its tracks. That's usually a big red flag.
Rugrat showed how OLU's wagon got to like 7 or something, with all town on it and then it just died with no resolution.What nugget?