The most logical conclusion to me is nibel redirected to the tracker. If they do have a redirect, that’s the obvious play
If Rugrat is town, it means that a kill failed from scum. That means either the Jailer blocked the killer, or protected the one being killed.How would Gad being SK explain mangos result?
Well yeah, Rugrat still makes the most sense as SKWell here's the other thing.
If this sequence happened we can probably assume that mafia and SK were both not interfered with
So why do we only have two kills? Cough Rugrat cough
But isn't there a chance that there is only 1 anti-town left, like Dofla said?If Rugrat is town, it means that a kill failed from scum. That means either the Jailer blocked the killer, or protected the one being killed.
1 - Dofla is unlikely to be killed by mafia
2 - Likewise, Gad is unlikely to be killed.
3 - Mango has a failed result on Gad. Either Mango is blocked, or Gad is jailed, or Gad can negate tracks/watches on him, or Gad blocks Mango, fearing a track.
The issue here is that it would mean Serial Gad killed Dofla, and blocked Mango, or Scum redirected Nibel into Mango and Serial killed Mango, or scum redirected Nibel into Gad, causing the kill to fail. That's how Gad is Serial there. In fact, given the mechs, if Rugrat is town, pretty much one of Gad or Dofla must be serial due to the failed kill.
I think I've explained it clearly enough- any Mafia at this stage would be 1 scum vs about 12 town, the chances are slim as hell and very very unlikely that there is anything they can do to win. Stalling their demise is their best bet, in the hope that town think their way out of it. I don't really get how you see otherwise - even if we say it's not you, what chance does any Mafia have in this position claim wise that can open up a clear path to victory?There’s literally zero path to victory with my claim if I’m scum. I either die at night or get lynched, and that’s assuming I don’t get instantly lynched for claiming the tenth killing role
I genuinely can’t get my head around how you think it’s even remotely possible
There is always a chance, but it doesn't explain the kills from Night 2.But isn't there a chance that there is only 1 anti-town left, like Dofla said?
If that was the case, then that would mean there was no failed kill
From what I see your presumtions are based on there being an SK and 1 mafia left
Could you remind me how this supports there being 1 mafia and SK left now?There is always a chance, but it doesn't explain the kills from Night 2.
3 kills night 2. 1 from hime, 0 from Fang, which means two kills unclaimed. Assuredly, that comes from two different sources, and given that they're unclaimed, they would have to be Serial and Mafia.Could you remind me how this supports there being 1 mafia and SK left now?
That doesn't mean there's any scum left right now though.3 kills night 2. 1 from hime, 0 from Fang, which means two kills unclaimed. Assuredly, that comes from two different sources, and given that they're unclaimed, they would have to be Serial and Mafia.
But what if Cal was the last mafia?3 kills night 2. 1 from hime, 0 from Fang, which means two kills unclaimed. Assuredly, that comes from two different sources, and given that they're unclaimed, they would have to be Serial and Mafia.
We don't have a serial flip, and Fang and hime died. So for there to be 0 Mafia left, Rugrat must be town. Then, that means the Serial killed Hime. Technically possible, but that's what Rugrat's flip is needed for.That doesn't mean there's any scum left right now though.
You Possess the following abilities:
[All For One]-You can target a player at night Absorb one shot of their role(if they have multiple roles it will be randomized). The following night phase you have a choice of either using your role or gifting it to a teammate.
[Bulletproof]-If you are targeted by a kill you will survive the first attempt at your life.
If you are able to survive until Night 3 you will inherit a hidden ability.
I would assume that they won't be. In which case, they could have blocked mango, yes. Good catch.@Ratchet
Might be some room here for them to have copied a Jailer and they have one in stock given to their last guy
I'm not really clued in on if "absorbed" means the target would be informed or not
Also, on that note, I don't know if it lends to your theory here, but I found it very strange that he name dropped killing flower for no particular reason.Moving back to Poyser, I should point out that the way he is defending himself currently is remicient of scum.
Scum want to make themselves hard to catch. They do things to argue "why do I do this as scum" - the idea is to make it hard to figure out their thought process. As long as you buy enough plausible deniability, you can survive for a while. As town, I would expect Poyser to be looking for who the last scum could be - he would know it's not him, and at the very least he would want to be informing his desperado shot as well as he possibly could. Instead, he is not doing that, because that's a lot of effort for what is probably a token effort of resistance - instead he's demanding one argues on his terms. It's very easy for Poyser to say "desperado doesn't let me win the game", because he knows that it is hard to logically argue a way for him to win through claiming it. Of course, he knows it's hard to logically argue a win path from here full stop, but that's how scum argue - they lead the discussion by being the ones to set the requirements for the argument, and then when an argument doesn't meet them, they defend themselves by virtue of it.
It's important to remember that scum can win the logical arguments, especially when they're the ones demanding they reach a certain standard. He should only ever be cleared upon death, whether that be what ends the game or not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?