I mean, it is what it is. You're telling me your certain that Poyser is scum, and you're turning down an opportunity to explore his motive. You don't have to agree with me, but dismissing out of hand what his possible motives here is not helping your case, implicitly, since a case relies upon a foundation of good evidence and a convincing narrative. If you're not even going to try, why should I take you seriously?
As for the PR subject - and to be clear, this is not in the context of me specifically but in general, I am neither confirming nor denying I have a post restriction - here are 5 reasons why what you're asking is pointless and fucking dumb:
1) Post restrictions usually do not need any prior justification for existing other than flavor. So it's pointless to inquire about their purpose.
2) It's also pointless to ask why or why wouldn't a host would include one, not just due to point 1) but because they have little to no mechanical impact
3) Why would you ask me, as a player, to justify the role I was given, or to explain the punishment or lack thereof for an implied violation of a post restriction, when both of those things are in the domain of the host?
4) Why would you assume the violation of a post restriction requires a specific given punishment that you should be aware of?
5) Why is any of this shit even alignment indicative, or relevant?