Well, I think my role adds another element to this, just wanted to make sure we wasn't waiting on any other claim.
- Status
Bachi
Distinguished
I KNOW THIS, IT WAS A DUMB MOVE BUT W/E
-LETS GO MHA-
Rugrat
Caldust
This is just utter rubbish. There never was any after I claimed and in 99% of games there shouldn’t be any.
All of the prominent mafia flavors have flipped, so there's technically room here (if Rug is to be believed) that they're already wiped and we just have an SK on the table, don't really know about that one though
Bachi
Distinguished
DO YOU THINK THAT THERE IS A SECOND ROLE BLOCKER?
-RADIO MHA CONTINUES-
I'm Ingenium, 2 shot rally. Rally let's me do one of two things - I can either given them two vote power for the next day phase, or motivate them next night phase, giving them an extra usage. Apparently if they have multiple roles, one is upgraded at random.
So, obviously if I use my vote power increase on scum at the wrong time, it could end up giving them a majority lynch early, with a hated on top of that is really, really rough. I do think my ability is meant to be a counter to the vote block, temporary though it may be.
Abstained night 2 and used my motivate on Nibel night 3, which means he should be able to jail two people night 4. Figured I should motivate him or hime, opted for him because there was too much unknown about what it could do for hime.
So, obviously if I use my vote power increase on scum at the wrong time, it could end up giving them a majority lynch early, with a hated on top of that is really, really rough. I do think my ability is meant to be a counter to the vote block, temporary though it may be.
Abstained night 2 and used my motivate on Nibel night 3, which means he should be able to jail two people night 4. Figured I should motivate him or hime, opted for him because there was too much unknown about what it could do for hime.
Your slot was in the PoE, your thread play has been to defend scum basically so not much good there, so yes there was suspicion on your slot and there still is. The number of killing roles was brought into question yesterday too, you're rewriting history here.
If this is the best your defence is going to be, you should save your time and try and figure out a solve somewhere.
Nibel's going to miss twice isn't he
Rugrat
Caldust
I’ve already said I’m finding a solve.
But it’s dumb to try and present a vig withholding their shots from their claim, as some kind of gotcha.
Bachi
Distinguished
WELL IF HE BLOCKED MANGO I CAN FINALLY MAKE PEACE WITH A TOWN READ THERE
-THIS CAN BE HUGE THO CLEARING 2 ROLES-
+POYSER
-LETS GO MHA-
I'm going to be insufferable if there are only 4 mafia, but yeah maybe. Still think it's Poyser though, I mean it's more killing power on top of more investigation power basically at the strength of an inverse Hider. Also don't think anything Rugrat has said has been particularly compelling so both can easily be scum imo. Rugrat probably not Mafia, obviously
[Vote lynch Rugrat]
bbl
bbl
It's dumb to withhold this when transparency is sorely required, and then reveal it when part of the argument against you is the number of killing power roles the town has being hard to reconcile, and then act shocked that you get suspected for it. When you withhold parts of your claim, you do so with implicit risk - it's up to you to weigh that risk up. In some cases, it backfires, this being one - you can't have your cake and eat it too.
Even if he does, it should basically solve the PoE in one night, which was the main thinking behind my action.
Day 4 vote count 1
Mango: Gad > Rugrat
Ultra: Rugrat
Rugrat: 2
With 11 alive it‘s 6 to lynch.
@MangoSenpai @Ultra Can you remove your votes for now please.
[Unvote]
- Status