Game Ranked My Hero Academia Mafia Thread

[Bachi]

I can make sense of it coming from scum looking for a way to get out of voting Ekko without conceding actually, but then I can't get past the PR so welp

I MEAN I CAN VOTE EKKO HERE, BUT IS HE GONNA FIGHT BACK WHEN HE IS ASLEEP OR WHATEVER?
-REAL QUESTIONS ARE BEING ASKED MHA-

 

[Flower]

Not gonna vote the subs today.

 

[Ratchet]

I MEAN YOU ARE IN PERFECT SYNERGY WITH EKKO, EKKO IS TOWN READING MULTIPLE TIMES AN AFK DUDE, EKKO IS PUSHED BY CP, WITH VALID REASONS, THEN YOU SUB INTO THAT AFK SLOT, TOWN READ EKKO- JUMP ON CP, ITS ALL TO FKN PERFECT.
-WHEN THIS WAVE HITS IT SHAKES YOU TO THE CORE AND MAKES YOU STRONGER THAN BEFORE-

What reasons?!

 

[Bachi]

Not gonna vote the subs today.

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MY PUSH FLOWER, IT IS WORTH NOTING EKKOS BEHAVIOR AROUND LAWLS, AND RATCHETS SYNERGY WITH HIM?
-STAND UP AND SHOUT LOUDER HEROES!-
IF YOU DONT WANT TO VOTE THE SUBS THAT FINE, BUT WE SHOULD DO SOMETHING TODAY THO

 

[Ratchet]

I MEAN I CAN VOTE EKKO HERE, BUT IS HE GONNA FIGHT BACK WHEN HE IS ASLEEP OR WHATEVER?
-REAL QUESTIONS ARE BEING ASKED MHA-

How is my "fighting back" helping you read me whatsoever?

 

[Bachi]

What reasons?!

THESE REASONS, I AGREE WITH THIS ENTIRE ISO

next time he mentions reloaded it is to sus him







later he asks reloaded to claim

reloaded refuses and ekko never follows up



ekko's response to my post above. asked him to claim earlier, now says he's "good with getting a claim"

ngl in retrospect this pings me as potential TMI lol but I'll feel bad if he's just having a good town game and playing peacemaker















this could all certainly be construed as TMI though. he seemed really certain about this and wanted to convince the thread that 1) magic gave fakes 2) reloaded just panic claimed without help 3) he's flipping mafia

overall his progression on relo strikes me as odd. started off defending him against ultra's case, then said he was sus and asked for a claim, didn't get it, dropped it, when relo became a topic again he reiterated he wanted the claim, and then went all in on reloaded being a panicking mafioso who ignored the fake magic gave him, which seems unnecessarily specific. I'll also say that ekko's overall been relatively reasonable and cooperative this game which always gives me suspicion with his slot, and I do think he's been barking up the wrong tree re: RDK who he clearly preferred pressing to pressing reloaded. could easily see this being aligned with reloaded and leaning scum regardless.

-RADIO MHA CONTINUES-

 

[Bachi]

How is my "fighting back" helping you read me whatsoever?

IT HELPS ME FIND YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS AND WHY YOU DECIDED TO PICK THIS -LYNCH CP DIRECTION-, I MEAN CREATING MORE DISCUSSION GENERALY DOES NOT HURT ANYONE.
-YO MHA WHERE WE AT?!-

 

[Bachi]

worth mentioning this is exactly how ekko played it when we were scum together and I was being cased. he hard defended me in the beginning

continuing his iso

I LIKED THIS POST ALSO
-LETS GO MHA-

 

[Atsumori]

I really don't like how Bachi is playing. He's only pushing people by making their posts looking suspicions.

 

[Atsumori]

Suspicious

 

[Bachi]

I really don't like how Bachi is playing. He's only pushing people by making their posts looking suspicions.

THE MEANING OF A PUSH IS TO GO AT IT WITH THE MENTALITY TO PUSH THAT PERSON, ALSO SHOW ME THE EXAMPLES WHERE I MADE SOMEONE`S POSTS LOOK SUSPICIOUS!
-I AM ABOUT TO RETIRE MHA, IT IS WHAT IT IS-

 

[Flower]

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT MY PUSH FLOWER, IT IS WORTH NOTING EKKOS BEHAVIOR AROUND LAWLS, AND RATCHETS SYNERGY WITH HIM?
-STAND UP AND SHOUT LOUDER HEROES!-
IF YOU DONT WANT TO VOTE THE SUBS THAT FINE, BUT WE SHOULD DO SOMETHING TODAY THO

I would vote Ekko if it‘s the consensus, but I‘m not gonna vote Ratchet who just arrived.

 

[Ratchet]

next time he mentions reloaded it is to sus him







later he asks reloaded to claim

reloaded refuses and ekko never follows up



ekko's response to my post above. asked him to claim earlier, now says he's "good with getting a claim"

ngl in retrospect this pings me as potential TMI lol but I'll feel bad if he's just having a good town game and playing peacemaker















this could all certainly be construed as TMI though. he seemed really certain about this and wanted to convince the thread that 1) magic gave fakes 2) reloaded just panic claimed without help 3) he's flipping mafia

overall his progression on relo strikes me as odd. started off defending him against ultra's case, then said he was sus and asked for a claim, didn't get it, dropped it, when relo became a topic again he reiterated he wanted the claim, and then went all in on reloaded being a panicking mafioso who ignored the fake magic gave him, which seems unnecessarily specific. I'll also say that ekko's overall been relatively reasonable and cooperative this game which always gives me suspicion with his slot, and I do think he's been barking up the wrong tree re: RDK who he clearly preferred pressing to pressing reloaded. could easily see this being aligned with reloaded and leaning scum regardless.

So, is this the grand case then? I don't see what's so good about it? It should be noted that this came before Reloaded flipped, so if we're going with uncharitable interpretations, this could very easily be him tying Ekko to a scum mate. In fact, isn't that exactly what scum would be doing there?

The first point he makes is a lack of "follow up" from Ekko in seeking a claim. While this is ultimately fair, it doesn't really suggest he must be scum, especially when you consider Ekko's personality. He can be very tenacious, but he's also inclined to follow his own direction, which Reloaded was not. Then he tries to establish a "gotcha" on Ekko by saying Ekko first wanted a claim, and then said he was good with a claim, which someone means he could be scum? I don't understand that point at all. And then the rest is just saying that Ekko has TMI for being right. Which, yeah, possible, but you can make that argument for anything anyone says if you try hard enough. In this post, I don't really see any attempt from CP to establish whether it is TMI or not without much regard for whether it's plausible for him to believe as town or even why he approaches it this way as scum. His conclusion is convenient - he gives an example of why Ekko might not have been all-in on Reloaded from the start, and then frames that as scummy, and then ties him right to Reloaded. Doesn't inspire confidence in me at all.

 

[Ratchet]

I will concede that Ekko being calm and reasonable this game is somewhat jarring - I had him as town early day 1 because I agreed with his position on RDK, but I can see that angle. The rest of it though doesn't really mean anything to me - there is nothing he brought up there that tells me why he's tied to Reloaded aside from him not doggedly pursuing a claim from Reloaded, which yeah he didn't, but there are lots of reasons for that, and it's weird to choose the one that happens to be what ties him to scum.

 

[Flower]

So, is this the grand case then? I don't see what's so good about it? It should be noted that this came before Reloaded flipped, so if we're going with uncharitable interpretations, this could very easily be him tying Ekko to a scum mate. In fact, isn't that exactly what scum would be doing there?

The first point he makes is a lack of "follow up" from Ekko in seeking a claim. While this is ultimately fair, it doesn't really suggest he must be scum, especially when you consider Ekko's personality. He can be very tenacious, but he's also inclined to follow his own direction, which Reloaded was not. Then he tries to establish a "gotcha" on Ekko by saying Ekko first wanted a claim, and then said he was good with a claim, which someone means he could be scum? I don't understand that point at all. And then the rest is just saying that Ekko has TMI for being right. Which, yeah, possible, but you can make that argument for anything anyone says if you try hard enough. In this post, I don't really see any attempt from CP to establish whether it is TMI or not without much regard for whether it's plausible for him to believe as town or even why he approaches it this way as scum. His conclusion is convenient - he gives an example of why Ekko might not have been all-in on Reloaded from the start, and then frames that as scummy, and then ties him right to Reloaded. Doesn't inspire confidence in me at all.

The issue I have with that is that it‘s up to Ekko to challenge that if he‘s Town. But when he got heat earlier he just dipped, basically. Sure it‘s night time for him, but I disliked him trying to strongarm the lynch earlier by making people think Rugrat is the only viable option. We still have enough time anyhow, so I didn’t understand the rush at all.

 

[Flower]

What do you think of Gad/Dofla?

 

[Flower]

Specifically their interactions…or better lack of interactions this game.

 

[Bachi]

So, is this the grand case then? I don't see what's so good about it? It should be noted that this came before Reloaded flipped, so if we're going with uncharitable interpretations, this could very easily be him tying Ekko to a scum mate. In fact, isn't that exactly what scum would be doing there?

The first point he makes is a lack of "follow up" from Ekko in seeking a claim. While this is ultimately fair, it doesn't really suggest he must be scum, especially when you consider Ekko's personality. He can be very tenacious, but he's also inclined to follow his own direction, which Reloaded was not. Then he tries to establish a "gotcha" on Ekko by saying Ekko first wanted a claim, and then said he was good with a claim, which someone means he could be scum? I don't understand that point at all. And then the rest is just saying that Ekko has TMI for being right. Which, yeah, possible, but you can make that argument for anything anyone says if you try hard enough. In this post, I don't really see any attempt from CP to establish whether it is TMI or not without much regard for whether it's plausible for him to believe as town or even why he approaches it this way as scum. His conclusion is convenient - he gives an example of why Ekko might not have been all-in on Reloaded from the start, and then frames that as scummy, and then ties him right to Reloaded. Doesn't inspire confidence in me at all.

AT THAT POINT CP WAS CASING PEOPLE IN QUICK SUCCESION, HIME, WATSON, EKKO, IT WAS ALL AFTER RELOADEDS CONCESSION, AND PEOPLE WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHATS NEXT- I MEAN CP WAS TRYING THE MOST AT THAT POINT IF WE ARE TO BE FAIR,
HIS CONCLUSION DOESNT INSPIRE CONFIDENCE BECAUSE ITS A D1 CASE, HE HAS NO MECH ON EKKO, BUT HIS OPSERVATIONS ARE ALRIGHT.
AND IM OK WITH THIS DIRECTION OVERALL, OUTSIDE OF EKKOS DEFENSE ON RELOADED, AND HIS TOWN READ ON AN AFK SLOT, WHO IS HARD PROTECTING HIM NOW, SOMEONE SHOULD GIVE ME A BETTER CASE TO FOLLOW IF THEY HAVE, CUZ I WONT FOLLOW A CASE ON CP BECAUSE HE ISOD WATSON`S PREVIOUS GAMES.
-BREAKING NEWS: THE HEROUS ARE HERE!-

 

[Ratchet]

None of this makes any sense, ultra was the first to mention reloaded as scum and cased him pretty convincingly. He was going to get plenty of credit as is. No need for him to do any of this crap and I don't buy that you believe any of it either, big vibe of you making it up as you go along here

vote hime

I think this is fair, but I also don't think hime as scum sees that and thinks it's a good idea to maintain her suspicion on Ultra without really being aggressive with it. I had her as town day 1, but I felt like her suspicion on Flower over the claim was silly. I'll need to see what her posts around the Reloaded wagon were

 

[Ratchet]

AT THAT POINT CP WAS CASING PEOPLE IN QUICK SUCCESION, HIME, WATSON, EKKO, IT WAS ALL AFTER RELOADEDS CONCESSION, AND PEOPLE WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHATS NEXT- I MEAN CP WAS TRYING THE MOST AT THAT POINT IF WE ARE TO BE FAIR,
HIS CONCLUSION DOESNT INSPIRE CONFIDENCE BECAUSE ITS A D1 CASE, HE HAS NO MECH ON EKKO, BUT HIS OPSERVATIONS ARE ALRIGHT.
AND IM OK WITH THIS DIRECTION OVERALL, OUTSIDE OF EKKOS DEFENSE ON RELOADED, AND HIS TOWN READ ON AN AFK SLOT, WHO IS HARD PROTECTING HIM NOW, SOMEONE SHOULD GIVE ME A BETTER CASE TO FOLLOW IF THEY HAVE, CUZ I WONT FOLLOW A CASE ON CP BECAUSE HE ISOD WATSON`S PREVIOUS GAMES.
-BREAKING NEWS: THE HEROUS ARE HERE!-

Yeah you're not really adding anything to what I said.