@Retrolize, what do you think of RDK that makes him sus?
- It's that time of the year again! Just kidding, we were late.
Click here to see the awards and nominate people for the rest of the categories.
- We're looking for artists. Direct message Dr. Watson for more info!
That's not a good explanation. He left the thread for half a day before giving a claim. He has team mates. C'mon.
He specifically avoided claiming a character and merely implied who he was.
Arne Slot
The Shiny One
that's why I CLAIMED it, not why I USED it.
The X
Resplendent
I voted Craig last phase.
No, he did claim a character. I can’t remember what it was but I remember the post. ISO him
The X
Resplendent
But you said you already explained why you used it?
T-Pein™
The Nexus
He literally did
The prototypical bad scum play when you have credible fake claims is to claim them in the most blatant and unapologetic way possible, not kick around dust and then *not* use them
Arne Slot
The Shiny One
This was yesterday's vote count.
This is the following discussion, which hasn't involved you yet.
The X
Resplendent
Fang took FIVEEVER to claim a character, even after being directly quoted multiple times.
thats the issue with soul's point
and if poyser was fake claiming then he wud never be killed by mafia because he is one of them but this isnt the point soul is making. thats what X is
The X
Resplendent
Did you believe your life was in danger N1?
T-Pein™
The Nexus
And who do u town read
Arne Slot
The Shiny One
mine? not really. another townie's, potentially a power player or power role? yeah
why not guarantee we go into d2 with no dead townies if we can? not using it would've been irresponsible
What’s your point lol? He did claim a character and I’m pretty sure it wasn’t his real character which proves he had a safe fake character
not that it’s a worthwhile discussion because obviously mafia have a safe fake character each, as you well know so not sure what you’re trying to do here
Please read the context instead of making me explain it for you. I'll do it this time but it's tiresome.
Ekko said he town read you based on your interactions with Aurelian. Specifically he felt you were cutting into his claim. I did not come away with that opinion. I told Ekko this. He asked me what part I was referring to - whether it was RDK or you distancing from Aurelian. The post you just quoted was me saying "I was referring to the Ultra distancing from Aurelian part".
This is not hard. You have a little arrow you can click to go through the previous quotes.
I must have missed it, was probably towards the end if he did.
Arp Bladstrum
Illustrious
That is a fair point but his ignoring a direct question about why he was defending a member of the Golden Order doesn't merit investigation? Unless of course im wrong and he has already addressed that without responding to me directly.
The might of our foes is vast and we must be stout of heart if we are to weather the coming storm.