Do the votes on Ultra not stand out to you then?3 quick votes over fluff posts whilst I’m in work is definitely something that stands out
Do the votes on Ultra not stand out to you then?3 quick votes over fluff posts whilst I’m in work is definitely something that stands out
Could you rank them in sussness from your pov?
I mean that seems a low bar?
OuchI model his town play as fairly simple and straightforward, and my bar isn't really too high for him to begin with, so
I model his town play as fairly simple and straightforward, and my bar isn't really too high for him to begin with, so
I model his town play as fairly simple and straightforward, and my bar isn't really too high for him to begin with, so
1. Ekko/you - opportunistic from Ekko but he just be being a bitch because I joked about him spamming games
2. You/Ekko - yours felt out of the blue as we come from the same place and they were blatantly fluff posts
3. Ultra - seems like a genuine vote from the way he was questioning it. Clearly doesn’t get fluff or my humour
Have you not seen me play as town before?
When do I ever partake in or show mercy to fluff, particularly over-egged fluff?
So what about the fluff stood out to you to generate a vote?
Well, you voted and said fluff time is over, it’s business time and then said you don’t show mercy to fluff.I’ve kinda given you a clue already, but interesting word choice
When you say ‘warrant a vote’ how damning a case do you need like 2 hours into day 1)
Well, you voted and said fluff time is over, it’s business time and then said you don’t show mercy to fluff.
Which means there’s conviction behind your vote, no?
I don´t know lol what did he do last game? I´m all for the husbando sister alliance working together again but I´d like to know what our statement would be for first^^
I mean it’s a serious vote as opposed to a fluff one yes
Could you answer my question please?
Ultra
Black Legged Dragon
Evans
TSworder
Natalija
Ace
SoulKiller
I believe we have multiple scum in this pile.
But I mean, if you think his play sucks (and fwiw, he is actually capable of making really good deductions, he’s just rash and impulsive and it kills his ability to persuade) then why apply an objective quality standard to his play and suspect him for seemingly missing it?
I'm not applying an objective quality standard. I'm saying he's normally a pretty straight shooter, and I'm *not* going to hold out for elements of his play that don't exist before voting him, like for example a high quality analysis post that could turn me around. Make sense?