Cool, not an argument though.
I probe you for information regarding your weird timing and happenstance to coincidentally agree on almost everything Soul said, read, and pushed on. And on top of that
you get overtly defensive and agitated about me asking your reasons for the weird attack angle on Juliet, not that I disagreed her entrance wasn't awkward but you kept saying and falsely saying I was "town" reading her for pushing you on reasons for your suspicion on her and why you and Soul were so keen to trip her up.
I proved pretty strongly it wasn't coincidental and it was pretty well timed. Your response to this was "no it wasn't I had to be able to perfectly predict Juliet being surprised by my aggressiveness on attacking her entrance post"
isn't a very good rebuttal. Day 1 ends with you:
-
being in complete lock and step with Soul on pretty much everything he said
- you backing on BPD on most of what he was arguing at Ultra - you suspecting Gramma who was like your
top scum suspect and liking Soul's posts voting Gramma
- you saying nothing of worth on Gramma today but opting instead to try and go after me for being aggressive at your slot which reeks more of a keenness to paly defensive then aggressively solving
Pretty weird not so much that BPD's vote didn't land on T-Pein EoD 1 with the lynch but Soul's was on Grammaton's (worthless and pointless) and yours on Juliet, and BPD's on Ultra.
Like 90% of the players were "null/x maybe neutral, maybe scum?", and mostly centeric to your OMGUS from players focusing on you.