Not much you can say to get me lynched lol, I’ve got a proven kill. Give it a rest
Uh, I'm implying your SK
Not much you can say to get me lynched lol, I’ve got a proven kill. Give it a rest
I can be convinced in this direction, he was going quite hard on the defense of Cal.I want to lynch Poyser today. I can cite quotes etc later, am at a good part in FF16, but I strongly feel like his interactions with RDK around his claim were partnered, and he was similar with Watson, as she was with him.
WELL, IM NOT VOTING THE VIG THIS DAY PHASE, AND GAD LOOKS GOOD LOOKING AT HOW RDK PLAYED AROUND HIMWell Fang's dead so you don't have to be motivated to lynch him either way.
DO YOU WANT TO LYNCH MANGO?Mango should be good btw, cps flip means he’s not a roletracker
THE OBVIOUS THEORY IS THAT THIS IS A 5 SCUM TEAM, AND THEY USED RDK`S ROLE ON DALTON-RUGRAT, D1, THIS IS WHY WE GOT 2 KILLS N2(+HIME`S KILL), I ALSO THINK THAT GAD LOOKS GOOD AFTER THIS RDK FLIP. I THOUGHT ABOUT THIS DEKU CLAIM AGAIN, AND YEAH, I AM NOT THAT MOTIVATED TO LYNCH FANG THIS DAY PHASE.
5XSCUM TEAM, 1X COP-4X WATCHER-3XHIDER, MAKES SENSE.
I WILL COME WITH MY VERDICT LATER, THESE THOUGHTS WERE MADE BEFORE THIS NIGHTS RESULT. I JUST SAW THE RESULTS, THE THEORY IS STILL AT PLAY, NOW WE NEED TO ISO ETC.
-MY LISTENERS KEEP YOUR EYES ON THE PRIZE-
DO YOU WANT TO LYNCH MANGO?
-LETS GO MHA-
Lmao, come on man, read his post again lmaoDO YOU WANT TO LYNCH MANGO?
-LETS GO MHA-
YEAH, GOOD CHANCES THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED, RDK HARD CLAIMED FOR RUGRAT, D2, D1 HE OBVIOUSLY DIDNT USED HIS ROLE ON WATSONThe "obvious theory" is that they blindly copied the "vig", in your opinion?
I went back and reread several parts of the game - the Reloaded claim, CP wagon, and the RDK wagon. I felt like on Day 2, RDK had a vested interest in lynching Gad there, which is somewhat unlikely to come from partners, and I can reconcile Gad's play as simply being survivor-esque over Mafia. He could be the Indie.
I checked Gram's interactions and I don't think he's partnered. He and Poyser were on the wrong side both Day 2 and Day 3, but I feel like Gram's read has come from a baseline expectation in RDK and CP that simply wasn't met this game, so I can understand why he was thrown off to an extent. I wish he was more co-operative there but I can reconcile it.
Well he fake cleared Watson, so why should this be used as evidence to clear Rugrat?YEAH, GOOD CHANCES THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED, RDK HARD CLAIMED FOR RUGRAT, D2, D1 HE OBVIOUSLY DIDNT USED HIS ROLE ON WATSON
-LETS THINK ABOUT THIS MHA-
I went back and reread several parts of the game - the Reloaded claim, CP wagon, and the RDK wagon. I felt like on Day 2, RDK had a vested interest in lynching Gad there, which is somewhat unlikely to come from partners, and I can reconcile Gad's play as simply being survivor-esque over Mafia. He could be the Indie.
I checked Gram's interactions and I don't think he's partnered. He and Poyser were on the wrong side both Day 2 and Day 3, but I feel like Gram's read has come from a baseline expectation in RDK and CP that simply wasn't met this game, so I can understand why he was thrown off to an extent. I wish he was more co-operative there but I can reconcile it.
WELL, THEY GOT A SHOT FROM SOMEONE, SO THEY HARD CLEARED THAT PERSON, IN FACT HE DID THAT D2, WHY WOULD THEY HARD CLEAR ANYONE LIKE THAT?Well he fake cleared Watson, so why should this be used as evidence to clear Rugrat?
AND THEY GOT THAT SHOT D1, AND USED IT D2WELL, THEY GOT A SHOT FROM SOMEONE, SO THEY HARD CLEARED THAT PERSON, IN FACT HE DID THAT D2, WHY WOULD THEY HARD CLEAR ANYONE LIKE THAT?
-LETS THINK ABOUT THIS MHA-