I don't see your point regarding "the game thread didn't need pushing forward". We *are* employing Majority Lynch here, which requires us to come to a consensus as a whole which, given we have about a day and a quarter (less even) remaining, is surely of the essence? If we factor in sleep time, work and other commitments, most of us really only have a window of about 12-15 hours left in which we can find a lynch and hit majority. Moving the game forward/getting discussion going is crucial in this format.Don't think the game needed to be moved forward at that point considering the game was like, twenty posts deep. Lethal had only posted three kind of week entrance posts and you soft town leaned them because they should be more fearful of posting. I just don't really buy your read of Lethal, your justifications for your read, and your claims it was an attempt to move the game state forward.
Does Evans strike you as the type to be unconfident as Scum? Given how others more familiar with him have expressed respect for his Scum game, I expect the opposite.
Alco, Dalton, RDK are all players I can vibe with as town.
Yabba Dabba dooSUP SUUUUPPPP
Not a lot! Other than AurelianWhat do you have for scum reads?
I'm still with you in spirit on the evans direction but I think there's a good chance at scum in Aurelia and think some more pressure would be helpfulThe consensus on his meta does not strike me as strong or universal. The best indicator is the reaction to my push rather than just surveying everyone, if it really is that off mark, I'll expect some strongly opinionated correction. Ball is still in the court.
It wasn't flattery. You being unable to read him is one thing, but you actively veto'd lynches on him. Compromise is the name of the game here, and by taking him away you make it that much harder to compromise on a lynch of him. I am not suggesting that you saying you won't lynch him will mean others decide to ignore him, I am suggesting that your defence is noteworthy.This is just silly. The man is a magnet for attention, I'm flattered you think I could do anything about the storm coming his way, and I'm glad I'm not actually in a position where I have to care about such a thing.
That said, yes, he does get differential treatment. Because he humors me for one, and admittedly I'm also not good at reading him because he is terminally non-serious, so I find it more fruitful to direct my efforts elsewhere. Satisfying?
Do you think evans is scummy? I must have missed your posts addressing thatI'm still with you in spirit on the evans direction but I think there's a good chance at scum in Aurelia and think some more pressure would be helpful
That isn't logical.
You've painted a bullseye on your back because your SoP is dictating right now you are operating like an opportunist. Which is by its nature, a fairly scummy behavioral trait to have brought out.
- I make my second post in the game
- RDK asks why I would announce my tardiness
- We have our little back and forth
- Poyser makes weird side comments
- You snipe at RDK saying he was deflecting attention from himself
Which is very ODD given there wasn't much scum or vote focus on lynching RDK to begin with before you pivot and switch around to say I'm somehow being extra defensive when I'm not, but for whatever reason or lack thereof, immediately switch on me.
I think his attempt to discredit your town read of lethal lacked logic and merit. Suggesting he would be bolder on a new forum because he can recreate himself doesn't track with me as most of the players here knowing him already anyway, so the idea seemed like a reach. Especially when lethal wouldn't want to draw attention to himself as scum which he surely would if he came out with a whole new meta.Do you think evans is scummy? I must have missed your posts addressing that
Okay, Ratchet. You don't think I get how days work or how this game works? Do you think I'm not a player who usually tried to push things forward? I'm saying that twenty posts into the game, Poyser trying to retroactively day his soft town read of Lethal was an attempt to push the game forward, is a reason I don't really believe. I think Poyser's actions and posts could make more sense from someone trying to establish a position within the game rather than someone trying to help the game state. I also think that there are more productive ways to push a game forward than soft town reading someone after three posts they made.I don't see your point regarding "the game thread didn't need pushing forward". We *are* employing Majority Lynch here, which requires us to come to a consensus as a whole which, given we have about a day and a quarter (less even) remaining, is surely of the essence? If we factor in sleep time, work and other commitments, most of us really only have a window of about 12-15 hours left in which we can find a lynch and hit majority. Moving the game forward/getting discussion going is crucial in this format.
I mean, get in line if you want to fuck.Fuck you
Yeah let's do it. No problem with this early push.I'm still with you in spirit on the evans direction but I think there's a good chance at scum in Aurelia and think some more pressure would be helpful
I'm still with you in spirit on the evans direction but I think there's a good chance at scum in Aurelia and think some more pressure would be helpful
Why are you saying they 'could make more sense' rather than they do make more sense? This feels wishy washy.Okay, Ratchet. You don't think I get how days work or how this game works? Do you think I'm not a player who usually tried to push things forward? I'm saying that twenty posts into the game, Poyser trying to retroactively day his soft town read of Lethal was an attempt to push the game forward, is a reason I don't really believe. I think Poyser's actions and posts could make more sense from someone trying to establish a position within the game rather than someone trying to help the game state. I also think that there are more productive ways to push a game forward than soft town reading someone after three posts they made.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?