meming on the name of the site lolWhat is the one last thing btw
yes when players r inactive i tag them to post. this is differentI think he calls out people a lot in games.
its so we dont accidently look at a player and see if they r in a convo or not - ruins the spirit of the gameSus post
Like he wants people to point people towards lurkers undercover
don't paneeeeeeeekYou read between the lines here very wrong and are quick to get defensive here, slow your ass down
This wasn't me siding with a policy lynch, it was me agreeing and saying I don't know what to expect of your play but the effort you're putting in may be a indicator you're, DRUM ROLL, town
If I were to side with a policy lynch, wouldn't I just vote you?
You understand your logic isn't necessarily followed by my own, yeah?
I'd rather not jump off the Aurelian wagon if people aren't going to vote with me. Wouldn't be productiveIs there anything stopping you?
I'd support that wagon too, not ready to release aurelia from the shackles of suspicion yet though!Not feeling this Retro fella either tbdean
You have yourself, T-Pein, potentially Poyser, can't remember who else. You could at least start to get support for a claim from me - I've already stated it would take 8 votes. For reference, I probably won't be around when Aurelian comes back, so if you're going to get something going, the sooner the better.I'd rather not jump off the Aurelian wagon if people aren't going to vote with me. Wouldn't be productive
I might prefer retro, stay tunedYou have yourself, T-Pein, potentially Poyser, can't remember who else. You could at least start to get support for a claim from me - I've already stated it would take 8 votes. For reference, I probably won't be around when Aurelian comes back, so if you're going to get something going, the sooner the better.
Could I interest you in Ekko instead?I might prefer retro, stay tuned
in the event that what i said was agreed upon in the future - this tells you that there is a mindmeld, and whoever i agreed with is prolly townieI think I've seen enough of this thing you're doing, where you act like you're catching up but you're just parroting previous things or theorising possibilities that later prove to be true (Aurelian being Fang for example).
Vote: Ekkologix
noone wants a claim from you tho?You have yourself, T-Pein, potentially Poyser, can't remember who else. You could at least start to get support for a claim from me - I've already stated it would take 8 votes. For reference, I probably won't be around when Aurelian comes back, so if you're going to get something going, the sooner the better.
Nah your arguments on him have turned me away from suspecting himCould I interest you in Ekko instead?
...have you read the context surrounding that post?noone wants a claim from you tho?
Why are you so eager to drive a wagon on yourself
am i not allowed to think out loud and see what reactions might come from it?Why did you feel the need to post it in the thread then?
That's strange, because apparently you agreed with them earlier. What changed?Nah your arguments on him have turned me away from suspecting him
the only time i played with him in ws he was town but inactive. how experienced is he? seems townie here so far even tho too much on sidelinesInoffensive so far, probably slightly leaning town if anything but not particularly married to it
Your post content has been pretty safe and vapid so far. Time to use more than 1.337% of your power.in the event that what i said was agreed upon in the future - this tells you that there is a mindmeld, and whoever i agreed with is prolly townie
instead of this, talk to me about my post content if u like it or not. i am bound to eventually catch up and talk in real time so it wud be easy to see none of this was an act anyway
You quoted my post and responded by outlining your actual case on tpein like you thought you'd found a safe wagon to join.do you people not understand the terms youre using
"latch on" implies piggybacking off reads consistently
if i actually agreed with a policy vote, id vote the dude
saying "idk what his play is and last game i didn't find his play memorable, and the fact he's putting in more effort despite posting things i have pointed out" =/= "durrrr durrrr he's scum im totally agreeing with all this xD zomg"
you guys fail to realize i have very limited interactions with many of you, and youre wrongly assuming i know why people are policy voting or sussing him
if you feel others have an agenda, point it out to me
unless you yourselves have your own agendas, what the fuck ever
i dont know any of you people and you don't know me
why you'd think i know people's plays is mind boggling, or that i should.. which is based on what? generic assumptions and basic psychology?
Imagine if he was a jester! Good heavens!noone wants a claim from you tho?
Why are you so eager to drive a wagon on yourself
that there was some suss around you, then CP talked about retro, then you brought attention back to yourself....have you read the context surrounding that post?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?