Except there has to have been an explanation for my survival, and yes it was not a passive ability of mine. So in this case he is just telling the truth. What are you doing?Ahhhhhhhh what? Why are you talking about Gram's botch? Why are you revealing this now? Again your claim just comes out of nowhere.
Look at what CP has done. Faction kill failed N1 so he claimed he stopped it. Faction kill failed N2 and he's claiming it. Great coincidence.
i had a list few pages back can do an updated one after catching up but not much changed. im still struggling to pick sdiesgive reads
*I* can confirm it because I'm not dead. Jeez.Note that both of CP's claims were made to fit the narrative of the thread and has not distributed or can be confirmed in any way.
I meant before he claimed indie. he said he's not going to claim out of spite or something and then you voted him.There is nothing contradictory about this, really. I had a gut town read on him and was inclined to potentially look the other way if he didn't claim and a player I suspected more was up to bat.
One he claimed indie, however, the burden of proof changes, and he is now lynch by default, especially with his multiple mishaps. I was still sold that he was likely not-mafia, and probably an SK, but I'm never going to go for a no lynch over that.
Note that both of CP's claims were made to fit the narrative of the thread and has not distributed or can be confirmed in any way.
okay but this means u agree RDK is bad lolI had the exact same thought lol
there r that many players left??? feels like 14 lolOnly seven reads with twenty players left?
I meant before he claimed indie. he said he's not going to claim out of spite or something and then you voted him.
I don't believe Craig and how is just throws out convenient claims at convenient times. WS philosophy is to use a claim when you're pressure or in danger. Craig has just tossed out two claims, without being under pressure, that just so happens can't be proven and fit into the narrative nicely.Except there has to have been an explanation for my survival, and yes it was not a passive ability of mine. So in this case he is just telling the truth. What are you doing?
But we don't know why those kills failed. Also, we shouldn't know that you didn't die.*I* can confirm it because I'm not dead. Jeez.
for the sake of statistics, wud it be more interesting if they r both same alignment or different alignments lol?interesting juxtaposition
I don't know if you're some kind of Jester, but Craig's claim of protecting me last night is basically confirmed. He's town.I don't believe Craig and how is just throws out convenient claims at convenient times. WS philosophy is to use a claim when you're pressure or in danger. Craig has just tossed out two claims, without being under pressure, that just so happens can't be proven and fit into the narrative nicely.
Yes, but his claim was made after that and for no reason. No one was asking why there was no kills. No one was pressuring him. Just 'hey guys I stopped all kills'. So yeah, I have my doubts about the validity and the motivations behind the claim.There were no kills N1. That
pretty much confirms his first claim, no?
i think he is scum and im not worried about you just throwing his name out as much as you not having prior established scum read of him to support that decisionAm i scummy or just wrong or making a bad move? I admit throwing RDK's name at CFD wasn't the best, but I was rereading his interaction with Fang, with YOUR POV in the back of my mind, and I thought, MAYBE RDK could be scum, so I tossed his name out to see if it would go anywhere. I view CFD as an opportunity to do something maybe a bit different than how a full phase vote would go.
I agree, I tried to avoid it. He brought up because he saw it. I can't help that. Alas, we do know that, and this is reading like scum upset about this honestly.But we don't know why those kills failed. Also, we shouldn't know that you didn't die.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?