so you think Flower asking for the lethal claim was bad but think gramma doing it was ok?
what the..
I don't think Gram is 100% town fyi.
But I've got a pretty good record of reading Ekko, and I'm like 80% sure he's scum.
so you think Flower asking for the lethal claim was bad but think gramma doing it was ok?
what the..
What's the point of claiming when all it does is give scum more information and leave town at a disadvantAge?
well my reaction was that I figured you had info and that gramma immediately started distancing his teammate tiara lol
tho reading back it looks he was sussing her d2 as well but didn't really follow through as the lethal stuff blew up the thread
But I've got a pretty good record of reading Ekko, and I'm like 80% sure he's scum.
I didn't say you had a case on gram? t-pein didIf you thought I had info on Gram why would you question me not dropping a case like it was suspicious and not the logical explanation?
Oh right, because you're scum. Carry on.
Exactly.
and it was gramma asking for the Full CLaim....
the slip is NAI. flow could be right or wrong. why r u making it seem like the slip is outright townie?Do you really think scum wouldn’t be aware about lynch pins?
Thats a stretch of a slip lol
divulge please. its demanded.Depends how he plays when he comes back in :draper2:
I can’t fully divulge yet, but I’m in on Tiara
Yes, I’m aware you disagree. I wouldn’t have known unless I asked though, would I?
Do you still think this is possible? Or is he town? Or is he just in range of every fucking alignment?
I think there’s a big difference between blind lynching on D1 with no info and not much play/lynches/wagons to go off than lynching on a later day phase where there’s more info and play to consider, players involvement on mislynches etc
We’re probably not going to have any ‘info’ in this game, so what’s to stop scum just never claiming in your eyes?
I'm failing to follow through this interaction between u and @Poyser @GrammatonUncooperative wagons get lunches :draper2
Role related. Likely I've been investigated.
I don't have info at all, I read something I thought was a slip. Hence why I said I could be completely off with it lol. It's why I asked why I was being mentioned. I still feel iffy about it as on their reads list I was the only one being outright called scummy.
Lethal didn't seem likely to happen today who's my biggest scum read. I haven't considered last night at all. I've considered maybe I'm wrong on Lethal as you and Poyser are going at him being town and that's why I moved to Tiara with the above.
Poyser turning on Lethal makes the wagon much more likely to happen than just me leading it and gets us closer to scum.
evans making gram look better as well if he ever flips scum here. can say these 2 probably not alignedso explain the word choice here of ‘gets us closer to scum’
as opposed to say ‘gets scum’?
gram also commented on evans making him and poyser go on each other as he did in a previous game. that seemed kinda weird to me as I don't see it much myself, but it solidifies that these 2 r most likely not a team, tho it isn't out of the realm of distancing given they arent strongly pushing each other.im sure you dont
except when you’ve got previous history using that exact strategy
do u think he "misunderstood" or is just making shit up. he did not really push tiara at all when she made that post. its like he's just developing reads on the flyhe thought you mentioning him by name earlier as a possible lynchpin was a slip that you'd investigated him lol. he obviously didnt understand the context of why his name had been mentioned, even tho to me its pretty obvious but idk
I didn't say you had a case on gram? t-pein did
no it was the "whatever the lynch will be" and the lack of anything substantive since the gram vote that made me wonder wtf you were up to and then t-pein saying you had a case coming reminded me of the ekko case you teased so much d2 and then never dropped or mentioned again. why would you having info on gram preclude you from dropping a case on a different player?No, you were trying to shade by not dropping a case on Ekko. If you thought I had info on Gram, should be rather obvious why I would drop it. Instead you acted like this contradiction implicates me.
You realize this whole game you've said shit that's been called out and then you try to fill the gaps after your original idea, yeah? If you don't want to bf misunderstood, do better explaining your whole point initially. Looks awful scummy when you try to over explain your way out of a call out.im referring specifically to an end of day scenario where we have nothing better
im not saying just randomly lynch people as soon as they claim VT, and I’ve no idea why you think I’d suggest that beyond you thinking I’m a total moron
You couldn‘t be further from the truth.Flower I’m very sorry if I’m wrong
but my inner cynic sees you liking a lot of posts and it feels like a subtle positive reinforcement strategy lol
no it was the "whatever the lynch will be" and the lack of anything substantive since the gram vote that made me wonder wtf you were up to and then t-pein saying you had a case coming reminded me of the ekko case you teased so much d2 and then never dropped or mentioned again. why would you having info on gram preclude you from dropping a case on a different player?
not when you didn't follow the vote up with anything and are continuing to sus ekko vaguely without dropping the case you supposedly have????????
Should be pretty fucking self explanatory.
You realize this whole game you've said shit that's been called out and then you try to fill the gaps after your original idea, yeah? If you don't want to bf misunderstood, do better explaining your whole point initially. Looks awful scummy when you try to over explain your way out of a call out.
not when you didn't follow the vote up with anything and are continuing to sus ekko vaguely without dropping the case you supposedly have
It’s a negative reinforcement strategy?You couldn‘t be further from the truth.