Having it not claimed is no use because we wouldn't know who you tried to hide behind. So no, it's absolutely more useful now claimed. If you target a townie you said you commute so you can't be blocked or redirected. So, who?
Having it not claimed is no use because we wouldn't know who you tried to hide behind. So no, it's absolutely more useful now claimed. If you target a townie you said you commute so you can't be blocked or redirected. So, who?
I've thought of something, that maybe you've seen once or twice before, that could be a workaround. Which I haven't employed yet, since I wasn't going to use it, but probably will from now on
What? Seriously, what? Why would you *not* claim when you are essentially a suicidal cop? If you die, we have no idea who you hid behind. It's useless.
I've thought of something, that maybe you've seen once or twice before, that could be a workaround. Which I haven't employed yet, since I wasn't going to use it, but probably will from now on
This isn't accurate. I asked for an explanation about the case on him on D1 as I had mostly skimmed past Aurelian's posts tbh because they were annoying garbage. like refusing to claim and thinking he was hot shit when he wasnt. (I do the same with TPein and, to a lesser extent, ekko.) Iirc I was interested in one or two of the points made about him, less so about others. Was at a point where I would have voted had we needed the numbers, but preferred other angles (eg Retro). My willingness to lynch Fang faded away when he claimed Indie and a role I could feasibly see being Gramma-esque
I've always believed that lynching indie at this point is stupid; i'm all for a vig offing him but we want to maximise the info we get from people jumping onto/away from the wagon. lynching an indy doesn't give nearly enough info compared to scumhunting.