Having Rugrat and Big Man as scum is pretty weirdYou've not brought me up at all until this post, where you say your scum read.
I'd like to hear why (as well as why you scumread rugrat and bigman, who have both barely posted).
No, I’m doubting your sincerity so clearly it does have relevance to your alignment
But what convinced you to join Ekko in his death tunnel against RDK when you said you were going to death tunnel Ekko yourself?I joined kekko a while ago.
We joined against RDK.
I think the people trying to leave the areoloan wagon are basically scum.
At least the ones pushing it.
CP was a waggoner so he has a lower town read.
And me, who stayed on Aurelian as soon as I voted for him.How so?
Not counting Poyser who is a harmful indie and the one pushing tweet.
The others are lethal and RDK....
He dies if he chooses scum, not TownIf they die, he dies, means it's more of a reverse hider. If he chooses town, he dies. But that means the usual incentive of a hider, which is to hide behind someone scummy to protect yourself, is kind of lost here. He's commuted from the game, except if his target is targeted. Basically this role means you have to choose the right person just to be protect for a single night. Seems like a lot of risk with this ability for little reward. Like, I could choose the wrong player and then be killed, but I wasn't actually ever targeted at night or at risk of anything. Kind of a weird self preserving ability for a town role.
@Ultra I don't understand why you don't just claim a name to target. I don't understand why you didn't even think to hint a role that is self-sacrificial in its only utility. I don't know why you would holster Night 1. None of this makes much sense, your role can't even be affected except passively and you're trying to stipulate that you are concerned with scum screwing with your action.
How is it convenient? I’m already voting you and think you’re scum lol thay doesn’t make any sense as a comebackConvenient.
This makes sense.I am a Hider. This is what my role is called. How Gram treats that definition is on him.
Frankly a weird thing to get hung up on since even if I was just using a fake claim here, if anything going with *our* familiar understanding and not Grams would be suggestive of something being off. Like Fang and "super kill"
vote ultra
And me, who stayed on Aurelian as soon as I voted for him.
At least give us like, three names on who you might use it on so then we'd have some direction of you died.With all this aside, if it boils down to using it or getting lynched, I'll use it.
How is it convenient? I’m already voting you and think you’re scum lol thay doesn’t make any sense as a comeback
We need *one* name. And one name only.At least give us like, three names on who you might use it on so then we'd have some direction of you died.
At least give us like, three names on who you might use it on so then we'd have some direction of you died.
At least give us like, three names on who you might use it on so then we'd have some direction of you died.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?