Fuck, we should really listen to this guy with 10 posts, hold the fucking phone
Rugrat
Caldust
Defensive. Scum buddy probably
But he didn't you goober. And if he was, you are admitting he was lying when he admitted he thought Fang was truly Indi. Which in of itself is bad, but also begs the question of why he was soft on him.
What's your case little guy
SoulKiller
The Alpha and The Omega
I feel like there is no point into discussing things with you really, you are an outed scum. You can move along.
SoulKiller
The Alpha and The Omega
A player asked me a question and I merely replied, if it helps to give better context of the situation then why are you bothered? lol.
Tempest
Leprous Monarch
When did he say he thought Fang was truly indie? I don't see it in your case
But in any case, you said you thought Aurelian was town so again wtf is the difference?
SoulKiller
The Alpha and The Omega
>Outed as an indie when fang claimed as an indie
>Tried to push someone else when he outed himself as an indie
>You claim you put him in his coffin yet you did not vote for him.
Rugrat
Caldust
Why do you have a strong town read on him? Since you’re trying to discredit a push on him
SoulKiller
The Alpha and The Omega
Reasons for your push on Retro?
Yeah this question is not loaded whatsoever.
I can easily make the same accusation that you're lethal's buddy, so provide a reason or stop being a nuisance bolding giant text and go back to the magical realm of lurkerland
Rugrat
Caldust
I’ll disclose when Ultra answers my question
Tempest
Leprous Monarch
rugrat only trolls in these games. you can and should ignore him.
The X
Marvelous
See Tweet, I don't like that. I'm not asking for a recount of what happened; I don't need Poyser to answer anything. You have a vote on me. I'm trying to get you to justify that vote. You saying, 'I don't recall' says that maybe your vote on me hasn't been done in good faith.
Why are you voting with the two players that started your wagon in D1?
He says it twice before and after the team mate accusations
You're clearly holding our play to wayyy different standards guy
i think RDK is not game solving. the points he is bringing up are all weak sauce 0 analysis attempts to gotcha shade
> poyser saying "lol" as scum
> weak gotcha in ratchet missing half of my post - fails to elaborate how thats even scum motivated
> sus my post for telling players to hide their online activity in preferences
> latching onto fang being late - yes im accusing him of tmi here. it was totally unintentional blowup and fang fked it up. it was supposed to be a weak sauce point and if fang replies like a human being then all is well and dandy
> when fang claimed RDK just said "hes an indie finish him off lmao" with 0 analysis of the claim whatsoever. its not only pushing indies which RDK does NOT do like this, but also tells me he has tmi in fang being mafia
> RDK in GOT game stood so hard for indies who claimed to win with town. RDK is not standing for such indies now. i was waiting for a specific reaction from him regarding fang and poysers claims but he never delivered
> RDK today continues non game solving and engaging me mostly in either flavor or out of game discussions or just easy positions that cannot be reflected back poorly to him
hes not gna be an easy scum to case. i think i have him tho.
The X
Marvelous
Huh? Poyser led a wagon on Tweet after Fang claimed in D1. Poyser also started off D1 by voting Tweet. Not sure why you'd think Poyser was leaving him alone.
RDK
Marvelous
Rugrat
Caldust
The only reason to discredit a push on another player is because you have a strong town read on them. So yes, I will load the question and grill you hard.