obviously disagree with the first part.
which case is that?
The case *on* me.
obviously disagree with the first part.
which case is that?
Go find me responding the first four times.This is a very odd rabbit hole to be going down.
Also can you respond to the question I asked about why you thought CFDing with hardly any time left in the day into a player who’s being read town by most of the game was a good idea?
you should've protected me reeee would've meant they'd have to kill you to take away our JKand yes, i was poorly alluding to the fact i was preparing for people to start a lynch train directly on me
it's fairly easy to do so, and there's been suspicion from others surrounding my slot. and there's been alot of opportunitistic jumping throughout the game, too
I'm implying that you're scum annoyed that something that shouldn't be discussed and is disadvantageous to you is being discussed.Upset over what? Ratchet hoe can you come to the conclusion that I'm upset scum when you being revealed as a botched kill hasn't done damage to me? Like what should I be upset about?
i dont sus u lol. just said im willing to take ur side. and i was hard protecting u last phase lolRDK and I!
yeah but the missing piece for me personally is who is shifting to specific convos or old news and why
obviously, you don't see the futility in questioning other noise because you're confident he remains majority lynch.
what happens if, again, we get a goddamn no lynch? how many posters here are fairly predictable and consistent in their voting approach and reasons, and how many posters are unknowns and extremely unpredictable?
im not saying that ultra should be the topic of discussion but yes, pragmatically speaking, i agree with you.
im asking why he isn't for certain posters when yesterday alot of people were pressed for time, pressuring ultra, developing arguments to aid whatever narratives.
it's just taken a 180 degree turn in attitude and enthusiasm for an ultra lynch compared to yesterday.
and people were really gunning for it. who's to say that the tides won't turn again today?
im more wrong than right so ill just give my thought process to you instead of withholding a portion of it:
i wanted to observe what certain players (the players i don't really know) do after certain posts and my exchanges with them. i wanted to see whether those same patterns from yesterday would prevail, whether unvoting may occur, if those habits would change if called out, and who's obsessively folllwing the time and hours and minutes, or if people would pop up way close to the end of the day or not.
i dont want to name the players directly, however. i want to gather some analytical behavioral data at the very least
Are you high or something? Even after Poyser has flipped and it says he needs the Golden Order to be utterly destroyed, you STILL push the narrative that he was a harmful indie?Killing OLU was lame.
Literally no info from that flip.
We already knew poyser was a harmful indie.
I am donw to lynch tweet.
Not a fan of him refusing to lynch the harmful indie.
tn doing that wasted a vig shot.
well the game isnt gna move much without ur flip or lethal it just do be like thatThe case *on* me.
Yes I can.I still just don’t get the logic. You can appreciate how it looks bad no?
you were saying I was scum before the JK claimi dont sus u lol. just said im willing to take ur side. and i was hard protecting u last phase lol
RDK is a special case. i have made my arguments on why i think he is scum which i think are pretty reasonable from my PoV. if i am wrong then i am wrong, but im not just susing him for the sake of it. u can atleast try to figure out if im being genuine in my approach or not lol
It can happen, yes. If it does, it would need some quite blatant derailing. It's not something I'm going to worry about.what happens if, again, we get a goddamn no lynch? how many posters here are fairly predictable and consistent in their voting approach and reasons, and how many posters are unknowns and extremely unpredictable?
Where's my vote, Ratchet?You keep talking around this instead of acknowledging that Craig is, barring some incredible twist, simply town. Surely it's time to move on and find some different suspects?
What do you mean, he made enemies with the mafia team?@Poyser for the record i think ur play has been townie and i wouldnt have lynched u there. its sad to see u wont get to achieve ur win con. i must say u probably did not play this optimally by making enemies with the mafia team
anyway ggs.
Tweet. I'm going to need a bit more than that, yeah? Let me be clear - I'd like to see some cases or at least a documented process where I can see you re-evaluating the game.Where's my vote, Ratchet?
Not at all. Let's see some action then. People want to act like I haven't tried to explain that situation more than once. If you think that me RDK is the smoking gun on me, people should vote for me then.i wonder what this tells u then. i know u already conceded that its a bad idea. u expect ppl to just take it up and think u r townie and move on?
I told you why I sided with him, he's one of very few people who I can actually work with in this game, and it seems like a good portion of the rest are just off in a completely different world with the stuff they're pushing.I think Ultra probably is just town here. Did we get a character claim from him? Never moved my voted from Lethal so I rolled with Ultra. Lethal could always be GF, so I can't let him completely off the hook, but that's not for this day. Need to here more from Craig today as well since I'm not convinced his claim was 100 townie. I think Tweet looks really bad for last phase. Did not understand him siding with Poyser whatsoever.